I've done that already. The field strength differences suggest about 3.5dBd gain when the length of the radiating elements is carefully trimmed to suit the frequency.livendirect wrote: ↑Mon Dec 02, 2019 9:35 pm i have ordered one to compare with a dipole going to use same pole and coax see what the difference is
Moonraker antenna?
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2962
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: Moonraker antenna?
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"

- Bton-FM
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 2:55 pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
Re: Moonraker antenna?
Does anyone have a link to build one instead of buying?
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2962
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: Moonraker antenna?
A similar design - that works well - is the "Super-J". You have to scale the dimensions from the 2m version. It's not an easy aerial to build, but if you get it right, the performance is amazing.
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"

- Bton-FM
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 2:55 pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
Re: Moonraker antenna?
Don’t they fall over from wind?
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2962
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: Moonraker antenna?
http://sm0vpo.altervista.org/antennas/6dbvhf0.htm
Harry's a bit optimistic with his gain figures, but it's a brilliant aerial. I've used these for years.
Harry's a bit optimistic with his gain figures, but it's a brilliant aerial. I've used these for years.
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"

-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2962
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: Moonraker antenna?
Not if you build them properly. I used to join the two radiating elements with a tightly-fitting nylon rod inside.
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"

- Bton-FM
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 2:55 pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
Re: Moonraker antenna?
Does the colinear perform better than 5/8 vertical?
-
- no manz can test innit
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 6:49 pm
Re: Moonraker antenna?
Anyone know a UK supplier of the Comet 5/8 antenna?
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2962
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: Moonraker antenna?
Yes - significantly. The ⅝-wave is (usually) a bugger to match accurately, but Comet seem to have done some magic with their base loading coil to broaden out the bandwidth. Unfortunately, wider bandwidth always comes at the cost of reduced gain.....
As in almost all engineering, antenna design is a set of compromises. The http://sm0vpo.altervista.org/antennas/6dbvhf0.htm is in effect a single slot colinear. It's easy to build, and my original ones - made with some H-section aluminium rods used (originally) for room dividers - really went well. My "puny" little 40 Watts was easily equivalent to some people's 100W into a dipole!
The only problems that I encountered were making good connections to the aluminium rods - I sorted this out by using self-tapping screws. I first determined the exact feed points using crocodile clips, marked the locations and drilled small pilot holes to start the self-tappers. I soldered the coax connections to the self-tapping screws. I also found that I had to seal up the ends of the coax that were exposed to the rain, otherwise water would creep up inside the coax causing all sorts of problems! Once all the feedlines and the phasing loop were made and tested, I sealed all the ends with epoxy glue. I left the thing in my garage to dry overnight - the stink from the Araldite was horrible!
The first one was installed on a fairly low site, with a low power rig (40 Watts) (described as nietig!) and I was pleasantly surprised by the coverage it achieved. I passed the plans to a friend in London, who made a similar aerial for "Quest FM", and got great results at fairly low power.
I've built Super-J aerials and got really good results. The secret is not to have the phasing stub bear any of the weight of the upper section. I achieved this by using a rigid nylon rod that fitted tightly inside the upper and lower vertical radiators. I got the idea from a J-Beam design from some years before. You can also use a further nylon pipe to enclose the weakened "join" section, since the nylon will have no significant effect on the radiation. I've also built colinears inside fibreglass pipes - a great way of keeping everything dry!
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"

-
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 9:25 pm
Re: Moonraker antenna?
The moonraker is a normal 5/8 with a coil in the bottem not more nothing less
the design is almost the same as the comet only with fiberglass over the element(thin brass)
the design is almost the same as the comet only with fiberglass over the element(thin brass)
- teckniqs
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 3346
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:37 am
-
- big in da game.. trust
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:49 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Moonraker antenna?
I personally use a "Norwalk Dominator" which is a remake of the Sirio Vector 4000 for FM Broadcast. ( PCS electronics has one aswell, and named it the "exterminator")
Some say that the performance equals to a pair of stacked dipoles.
I never had 2 dipoles - but what i do know is that it's way - way better than a single dipole.
Specs are 5.15Dbi - 3Db
Some say that the performance equals to a pair of stacked dipoles.
I never had 2 dipoles - but what i do know is that it's way - way better than a single dipole.
Specs are 5.15Dbi - 3Db
- teckniqs
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 3346
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:37 am
-
- big in da game.. trust
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:49 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Moonraker antenna?
Does the comet has a LC matching circuit?
From what i have seen is that the radiator is connected directly to the SO plug ..
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2962
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: Moonraker antenna?
The one I had here had a base loading coil of about 4cm diameter, about 10cm long. There may have been capacitors involved in the base assembly - I didn't take it apart to find out. It wasn't particularly effective - but it didn't look like a dipole!
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"

- Bton-FM
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 2:55 pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
Re: Moonraker antenna?
is this right for the collinear?excuse the 5 year old ms paint skills:
- Bton-FM
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 2:55 pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
Re: Moonraker antenna?
Attached the wrong image but the question it was illustrating was are the two vertical elements half wave and the the distance between the feedpoint and the bend for the vertical elements 1/4 wave?
- Bton-FM
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 2:55 pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
Re: Moonraker antenna?
??
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- teckniqs
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 3346
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:37 am
Re: Moonraker antenna?
Sorry but what is that supposed to be?? !
....it looks like some kind of Dildo
....it looks like some kind of Dildo
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2962
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: Moonraker antenna?
http://sm0vpo.altervista.org/antennas/6dbvhf0.htm shows you how to do it. His dimensions are for 145 MHz. Recalculating for ~100MHz is easy!
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
