Re: J Pole Help !!
Posted: Sat May 20, 2023 3:22 pm
Looks like Yellowbeard and nrgkits.nz have some good advice. Maybe electronically made a mistake with the x2, a 1/4 wave will always be 1/4 wave when that is what is needed. If you struggle for velocity factor of cables, it's a property of what the dielectric inside is made from and it's construction. All cables with solid polyethylene dielectric will have a similar velocity factor, same goes for semi air spaced (like tv co-ax), polyethylene foam, PTFE. I doubt the difference between 0.66 and 0.68 will make much difference as the formula is only approximate anyway (speed of light rounded to 3x10^8 , then divided by 1,000,000 to use MHz for frequency). I'd go for 0.67 when a back and forth between 0.66 and 0.68 is happening.
A useful reference is here: https://www.electronics-notes.com/artic ... factor.php
I never bothered with J-poles because of having to waterproof a sliding contact (one of those SO239 to two element clamp things). My favourite antennas were the 5/8 groundplane and it's co-linear version - I liked the property of being able to add or remove the top part of the co-linear without the matching changing, and the groundplane to reduce RF below the antenna; where audio equipment was, and there would be all sorts of hum and interference with an antenna that didn't have a groundplane, even at the low power I was using.
A useful reference is here: https://www.electronics-notes.com/artic ... factor.php
I never bothered with J-poles because of having to waterproof a sliding contact (one of those SO239 to two element clamp things). My favourite antennas were the 5/8 groundplane and it's co-linear version - I liked the property of being able to add or remove the top part of the co-linear without the matching changing, and the groundplane to reduce RF below the antenna; where audio equipment was, and there would be all sorts of hum and interference with an antenna that didn't have a groundplane, even at the low power I was using.