I think the small ones are out of stock at the moment for about 2 months...
The other one is going for about 96 Euros. Ebay might be your best bet.
Although the PCB is available.... You could always have ago at building it yourself?!
Re: Can anyone recommend a decent RDS module?
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 7:03 pm
by NOYB
Whatever you buy I strongly advise you to buy one that locks to your pilot. Some are just free-running 57khz oscillators - although they may display station name in ideal situation they don't play nicely with all radios.
Re: Can anyone recommend a decent RDS module?
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 8:18 pm
by shuffy
Agreed. Get one with Pira's PIC in it. Never had a problem, and it locks to your pilot fine.
Re: Can anyone recommend a decent RDS module?
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 8:19 pm
by pjeva
It is best practice to regenerate / lock 57kHz to pilot tone of stereo coder. That way, both will be in phase and will cause less (or none) choped audio. Also, i don't feel good about this 100€ DSP solutions. Good and well filtered DSP will cost more than that. And for that money, you can build very nice analog encoder.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Can anyone recommend a decent RDS module?
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 9:32 pm
by shorty
I'd go for this one from ebay that you can sync to your stereo encoder pilot tone.
Why does it say on the enigma RDS page that it’s not for sale in the UK?
Re: Can anyone recommend a decent RDS module?
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2020 11:24 pm
by TGillies
Airomate 2 has always worked wonders for me. no hardware required, runs through your soundcard
Re: Can anyone recommend a decent RDS module?
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2020 12:49 pm
by reverend
Or try using Stereotool (https://www.stereotool.com/) which will do compressing, stereocoding and RDS in one go. Recently got this working with a fairly cheap Terratec sound card (https://amzn.to/3h6AIvP) which for £70 does 192 kHz sampling and seems to have a reasonably flat frequency response.
Apparently you can get this running on a Raspberry Pi, though I've not had a go at this and I guess some of the more processor intensive functions might not work properly.