Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
-
- big in da game.. trust
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:35 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
Who recognized this RF Power Amplifier?
I would like get some more data before connecting it.
I would like get some more data before connecting it.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 9:25 pm
Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
yes it's mine
Real old design with micro for SWR en Temp protection
Amp is a copy of the warnerRF 150W amp
Real old design with micro for SWR en Temp protection
Amp is a copy of the warnerRF 150W amp
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:01 pm
Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
remember be BW 150
- teckniqs
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 3346
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:37 am
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 2957
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am
Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
Those boards (or ones very like them) were available in the US through "Progressive Concepts" and Bext had a PCB just like that in one of their 3U 19" 100W drivers.
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"

-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:01 pm
Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
I said remembering me , because it is very closed ,yes this is a mosfet the other is bipolar 30 mz and used in fm how starnge that sdxx
-
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 9:25 pm
Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
I made this and still have the layout over here
It's not a BW of other amp
later version didnt use the stepdown regulator on the board
It's not a BW of other amp
later version didnt use the stepdown regulator on the board
- Electronically
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 11:43 am
- Electronically
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 11:43 am
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
Do you know something a mate of mine has this board he says you need 25 Watts to run that. Surely not
Sent from my AMN-LX9 using Tapatalk
- teckniqs
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 3346
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:37 am
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
You are correct, surely not indeed.
.....If your friend has put 25 to 50+ times the amount of required drive into this board then he has got a dead board!!

As far as I know the drive for H's board is around either 300mW, 500mW or 1W.
- yellowbeard
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 5:40 am
Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
SD1407 does take about 15 or 20 Watts to drive it to full power, BW used a BLF244 buffer on those amps, input power 0.5 - 1 Watt. An SD1407 on its own might require 25 Watts depending on the circuit. It's an old smokey transistor now, but that was savage gain when it came out first.
- Bton-FM
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 2:55 pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
It must be ~300mw since there is an RD06 before the BLF177.
...I dread to think of what would happen to an RD06 if you put that much power into it! Some magical smoke at least that’s for sure!

-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:01 pm
Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
thank you yellowbeard in fact yes . with 1 or 10 k at bias od blf244 if i am not mistaken .
- Electronically
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 11:43 am
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
I thought the same thank you teckniqs for clearing that up.teckniqs wrote:You are correct, surely not indeed.
.....If your friend has put 25 to 50+ times the amount of required drive into this board then he has got a dead board!!
As far as I know the drive for H's board is around either 300mW, 500mW or 1W.
Sent from my AMN-LX9 using Tapatalk
- Electronically
- tower block dreamin
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 11:43 am
Re: RE: Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
Spot on yellow boardyellowbeard wrote:SD1407 does take about 15 or 20 Watts to drive it to full power, BW used a BLF244 buffer on those amps, input power 0.5 - 1 Watt. An SD1407 on its own might require 25 Watts depending on the circuit. It's an old smokey transistor now, but that was savage gain when it came out first.
Sent from my AMN-LX9 using Tapatalk
- teckniqs
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 3346
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:37 am
Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
You are absolutely right in saying this and I would have mentioned this if he didn't just say "board" and said "the final output device".yellowbeard wrote: ↑Sat Jan 23, 2021 1:12 am SD1407 does take about 15 or 20 Watts to drive it to full power, BW used a BLF244 buffer on those amps, input power 0.5 - 1 Watt. An SD1407 on its own might require 25 Watts depending on the circuit. It's an old smokey transistor now, but that was savage gain when it came out first.
.....From what I am aware BOTH "boards" are around 300-1000mW drive.
You certainly wouldn't want to put 25w into a BLF244 which is the driver of the BW amp or put 25w into an RD06HVF1 which is far more than what the "board" is designed to be driven with.

-
- big in da game.. trust
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:35 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
Thanks for all the comments.
It will require about 300 mw of input in this setup without an input attenuator.
What makes me less happy is the low pass filter which can really perform a lot beter, the in band attenuation is way too high.
It will require about 300 mw of input in this setup without an input attenuator.
What makes me less happy is the low pass filter which can really perform a lot beter, the in band attenuation is way too high.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Marcel on Sat Jan 23, 2021 4:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- big in da game.. trust
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:35 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
Due to the lack of shielding between the filter sections, the harmonic attenuation from the 3rd harmonic can also be better, but in principle this is also sufficient.
What strikes me is that it often all well designed but the actual implemtation is quite lacking.
In this design I miss the shielding, the coils are too close to the PCB (lowers the Q factor) and there is a lot to be gained in the ceramic capacitors used.
If you look for other post between me (Tue Apr 28, 2020) will come across the design of a simple low pass filter which works much better because I have adhered to a few simple rules.
What strikes me is that it often all well designed but the actual implemtation is quite lacking.
In this design I miss the shielding, the coils are too close to the PCB (lowers the Q factor) and there is a lot to be gained in the ceramic capacitors used.
If you look for other post between me (Tue Apr 28, 2020) will come across the design of a simple low pass filter which works much better because I have adhered to a few simple rules.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- proppa neck!
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 11:06 am
Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
So filter coils should be raised a few mm above the board ?
-
- big in da game.. trust
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:35 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Who reconized this RF Power Amplifier?
About 8MM, but it is also important that the coils are not too close to the shield and that there is sufficients distance from each other.
Tried everything but <<DISTANCE>> is one of the important things.
Tried everything but <<DISTANCE>> is one of the important things.