2sc730 marking test?

Everything technical about radio can be discussed here, whether it's transmitting or receiving. Guides, charts, diagrams, etc. are all welcome.
Post Reply
FourierFun
who u callin ne guy bruv
who u callin ne guy bruv
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:04 pm
Location: Brandonland

2sc730 marking test?

Post by FourierFun » Tue Aug 30, 2022 6:14 am

Hi All,

Anyone know if authentic 2SC730 markings stand up to isopropyl alchohol? I have a few of these that look identical to the "61C" transistors from Mixin's thread ("2SC730 Transistor questions" from April 2021) but I put some isopropyl on a cotton swab to them and was able to get the markings to start rubbing off. I know with some chips that's a sure sign of a fake, but I don't know with these transistors.

Anyone know if original 730 markings are susceptible to isopropyl, or did I get a well constructed fake?

Thanks!

User avatar
teckniqs
proppa neck!
proppa neck!
Posts: 3346
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:37 am

Re: 2sc730 marking test?

Post by teckniqs » Tue Aug 30, 2022 6:20 am

You can usually tell just by looking at them, the genuine ones should have long gold legs and gold where they go in to the metal part around them at the bottom of the transistor.

...Have you got a photo?

FourierFun
who u callin ne guy bruv
who u callin ne guy bruv
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:04 pm
Location: Brandonland

Re: 2sc730 marking test?

Post by FourierFun » Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:21 pm

I had a photo I tried to attach, however the board won't let me for some reason. I tried both adding it here as an attachment (drag and drop and the attach button) as well as hyperlinking to an image file. Neither worked. I posted a message about it in Site News, Suggestions, and Feedback section.

What I can tell you is that they look EXACTLY like the 61C transistors in the thread I mentioned. Same font/logo placement/positioning, can colour, gold leads 20mm long (spec sheet says min 19mm) isolated from case, gold bottom, same shine to the can as in that photo. I'm reasonably sure they're not fakes but one of the tests that is sometimes used on chips and TO220 packaged transistors is to swab the writing with alcohol because its not supposed to come off. I thought I'd try that test on these- probably shouldn't have because it confused me further.

I guess the only way to know for sure is to put them in a circuit, but I have some personal stuff going on that will prevent me from doing that for a bit.

radium98
proppa neck!
proppa neck!
Posts: 973
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:01 pm

Re: 2sc730 marking test?

Post by radium98 » Wed Aug 31, 2022 9:40 pm

I have one burnt and 2 used original
I will try with alcohol and report back with pictures .can you post the circuit of the amplifier they are used in.i think ft 150mhz and 1.5 watt as I remember for Mitsubishi.

FourierFun
who u callin ne guy bruv
who u callin ne guy bruv
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:04 pm
Location: Brandonland

Re: 2sc730 marking test?

Post by FourierFun » Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:40 pm

Thanks radium!

The circuit is the rev fm transmitter. Experimentation purposes.

radium98
proppa neck!
proppa neck!
Posts: 973
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:01 pm

Re: 2sc730 marking test?

Post by radium98 » Sat Sep 03, 2022 8:03 pm

fourier not forgetting you , but far a bit from things ...

FourierFun
who u callin ne guy bruv
who u callin ne guy bruv
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2022 7:04 pm
Location: Brandonland

Re: 2sc730 marking test?

Post by FourierFun » Mon Sep 05, 2022 2:56 pm

radium98 wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 8:03 pm fourier not forgetting you , but far a bit from things ...
No worries. Im starting to get swamped on this side as well. September is going to be a hell month for me.

radium98
proppa neck!
proppa neck!
Posts: 973
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 7:01 pm

Re: 2sc730 marking test?

Post by radium98 » Tue Sep 06, 2022 7:23 pm

Sorry for delay again , sadly i lost one , i get the pictures with a digital magnifier. oneis scratshed , barely appear the markinfg but also old removed from something japenese .the other still have the original marking , legs are gold but the collector is at the case , and not like the c1947 wich the emitter in original is isolated also .I get one of the 47 with little marking barely visible , wich get hot and nothing at output .
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Albert H
proppa neck!
proppa neck!
Posts: 2957
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:23 am

Re: 2sc730 marking test?

Post by Albert H » Tue Sep 06, 2022 10:08 pm

Why are you trying to use 1970's transistors anyway? Try something newer like the Mitsubishi RD01MUS2 which will give over a Watt at 7.2V supply for just 12mW input power! You can get them from Enigma for <£2. I've used them since they came out.

My latest exciter uses just a DGFET for the Colpitts oscillator (at ½f), then another two FETs for the doubler and the buffer to drive the RD01 to 1.2 Watts - just right for a Motorola MRF101 or MRF300. The exciter uses four cheap CMOS ICs and a dual op-amp for the PLL (and the second half of the op-amp provides a mod buffer). The crystal is a 4 MHz temperature-compensated "oscillator in a can", and everything (apart from the inductors) is done in surface-mount.

Frequency selection is done by solder blobs between tracks (which prevents the average numpty "builder" changing the frequency of a stolen rig). The boards now arrive from India with the components already loaded, and they just have to have their frequency set, and be installed into their little tinplate box. The first production run was 400 pieces, and we were pleasantly surprised by just how cheap the boards were to get manufactured. Their spectral purity is really good for such a simple circuit, and with eight coil changes, they can be made to work on most of Band 1 (or the Japanese FM band).
"Why is my rig humming?"
"Because it doesn't know the words!"
;)

Post Reply